Shakespeare Was a Jew

(Since December, 2021, I am no longer certain whether Shakespeare was Jewish.)

Shakespeare, the world famous playwright, was a Jew.

After reading this claim, I expect some will make this argument:

“If Shakespeare was a Jew, then why would the Jews be hiding his Jewish origin, instead of celebrating it? If Shakespeare was a Jew, and the Jews know it, what prevents them from proudly acknowledging this world-famous author as a member of their tribe?”

I will answer that the Jews can only be hiding the information relating to Shakespeare’s Jewish descent (hide it, as the Jews are aware that Shakespeare was Jewish), because the concealment of this fact is working to their advantage. The Jews do not need to acknowledge a figure as openly Jewish, even though they know that Shakespeare was Jewish.

By hiding Shakespeare’s Jewish ancestry, the Jews can still take pleasure from the fact that he was Jewish, and that so many people throughout the world praise Shakespeare as one of the greatest geniuses that ever lived, while also placing any negative liability of his writings on non-Jews. If the Jews did admit that Shakespeare was a Jew, then the Jews would have to fear that more non-Jews would become aware of the magnitude of influence that world Jewry has on the world, which would naturally include their deception of the public through the malicious principles on which theater is composed.

According to books about Shakespeare, relatively little is known of his life. It is claimed in these books that this is because Shakespeare was born to a poor family, and playwrights during his career were held in low regard. His father, John, was a glove-maker. In the biographies of Shakespeare, it is often claimed that Shakespeare’s accomplishments are most impressive when considering he had an incomplete and meager education in his childhood and early adulthood. Since he was said to have come from a poor family, we may expect this to be true. I therefore bring this question to readers: How likely could it be that someone from such an insignificant family, from a small and insignificant town of England like Stratford, would become the most famous writer in the English language – perhaps even in the history of the world?

The claim that little is known of Shakespeare’s life because of his profession as a playwright cannot be true, as before his death he was already a very famous writer in England. Even the queen of England watched his plays on stage with him! So, if Shakespeare was such a famous figure during his lifetime, why did no one write a biography about him while he was still alive? And why did he leave almost no writing to the world concerning his own life? It is obvious that he must have been aware of his immense popularity in England. My explanation for this perplexity is that the Jews are hiding information about Shakespeare because they want people to view Shakespeare as a mystical and invincible figure whose life can never be understood. By doing this, the Jews are able to add even greater of an impression of their fellow Jew on people’s minds. If the public were given a more comprehensive biography of Shakespeare, the intensity of their reactions to his works would diminish as more people would come to a better understanding of the meanings intended by his works. Thus, the Jews claim that he was born in a town like Stratford – a town which virtually no one would have heard about had Shakespeare not been born there – and that he had an incomplete education, a story deliberated by the Jews to exaggerate the quality of his works by making his life appear unanticipated in contrast to the massive popularity of his works.

Brief mention should also be made regarding the name: “Shakespeare”. What is the likelihood that someone with a name so unique and unheard of would become the most well-known writer in the English language? How many people in England have ever had the surname “Shakespeare”? It is such an uncommon and peculiar name that it is very unlikely that the most famous Englishman would have such a surname at birth. It may be assumed that the Jews intentionally made the unique name “Shakespeare”, to further advance Shakespeare’s reputation as an odd and unknowable genius whose writings cannot be concluded upon in meaning. The early deaths of the direct descendants of Shakespeare are also rather suspicious. Supposedly, the Bard leaves no descendants today, the last surviving, his granddaughter, Elizabeth Barnard, dying in 1670. I suspect the Jews simply were trying to make Shakespeare as enigmatic a figure as possible. The less they know of him, the more the public is apt to worship him.

Shakespeare’s play The Merchant of Venice, featuring a Jewish moneylender named Shylock, also supports the belief that Shakespeare was a Jew. Shakespeare portrays this Jewish moneylender as someone to be pitied and sympathized with. As expected, the Jew Shylock complains about persecution and says that the Jews are the same as everyone else. Was Shakespeare trying to portray himself in Shylock? If Shakespeare was a Jew, he must have been a secret Jew of sorts. When Shakespeare was alive, practicing Jews had been expelled from England since the time of Edward I and the Act of Expulsion in 1290.

I will also add that Jews are fanatics of theater, with the main reason being that it gives them the opportunity to lie to and deceive the crowds. The Jews know that theater and dramatic art cannot solve our problems. Anything that is performed or acted in theater must first be accepted as a representation of reality; and why would people want events to be acted in plays when there are actual events to concern themselves with? My answer is that the Jews want to keep us wandering without arriving at a solution. This is the problem with the so-called theater and drama. One can keep contemplating a play or its performance in theater, but never come to a solution to the meaning behind that play. It is impossible for people to come to a solution in a play. A play must first be interpreted, and this can only mean what the author intended it to mean. A play consists of dialogue between fictional characters. This type of dialogue is impossible to analyze in a satisfactory manner, as one can never be certain of what the dialogue between these fictional characters actually means. Only the author of the play would purportedly know that. Any supposed understanding or theory of the meaning behind the play can only be gathered from information from texts which are outside of the play that are not created in the fictional character dialogue which the play consists of. Then, this preexisting knowledge can be applied to the scene of the play to try to understand the meaning behind the play. So, through Drama and theater the Jews intentionally leave the audience or the reader wandering without a sufficient or worthy answer or understanding of the meaning behind the play. Theater is simply a repeating of events. Anything which is understood in a representation of an event which is performed in the theater can only be understood from knowledge outside of the play. For this reason, there is nothing truly new that can be learned from the so-called dramatic and theatrical performances.

The writer of plays, who writes almost exclusively dialogue between the fictional characters in his plays, can attribute any wrong intentions to the characters of the play themselves, as the reader is left with many assumptions available, and with the true meaning always concealed by the playwright.

Following this, it can be concluded that the meanings behind Shakespeare’s works, as much as they can be interpreted, were already written of and discussed by men before Shakespeare ever wrote about them. Shakespeare’s writing lacks true invention, being scarcely more than what other men had already written about and discussed. The appeal of his works is largely due to his re-using of language and his ability to structure words in a more attractive way to the reader. There is nothing original, it seems, in the supposed meanings behind the plays. Thomas Carlyle claimed that Shakespeare was the greatest of geniuses, and that Shakespeare possessed a remarkable quantity of knowledge. Shakespeare’s writing, however, demonstrates a somewhat impressive knowledge of a diverse number of themes. Shakespeare had an elementary knowledge of many subjects; he was a jack-of-all-trades. He was not an expert in any field of knowledge. It appears that he never demonstrates himself as having exceptional learning in any of the topics that he mentions in his works.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is william-shakespeare.jpgShakespeare, the Jewish dramatist. This is one of the two portraits that are believed to be of him. This painting shows the curly hair, fleshy eyelids, puffy lips, and receding hairline which are characteristic of many Jews. Looking at this painting, he could easily have passed as a “Sephardic” type of Jew, which must have been the only “kind” of Jew in England during the time of Queen Elizabeth I. The Jewish Encyclopedia Britannica claims that the supposedly high forehead of Shakespeare which is represented in his portrait is striking. However, Shakespeare’s balding head does not necessarily mean that he had a truly high forehead, though it may look like it from the front. This can be very deceiving. As a high forehead is associated with a larger cranium, and thus a superior intellect, it is only natural that the Jews would like to have us believe Shakespeare had a high forehead, since this would support their claim that Shakespeare was a genius.

It’s no wonder the Jews are fascinated with Shakespeare and the so-called dramatic art. This fascination with the Jew Shakespeare is yet another trick by the Jews to confuse and distract us all.

Theater and dramatic art is a magnet for the Jews because of the lies, deceit, and immorality in general that comes with the performance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *