Why the Eugenics Movement Failed

(This article was originally written in April 2019. The writing does not fully represent my current views of the affair under consideration below. Some parts are rather dogmatic, deficient, and not justified by further knowledge and unprejudiced research, in particular concerning the alleged Jewishness of some of the figures that are mentioned, a few of whose portraits are shown below. The fundamental ideas of the article, however, I must still concur with.)

The eugenics movement was arranged by the Jews to help ensure that their plan for world control could be fulfilled by lowering the moral, intellectual, and physical capacities of non-Jews through dysgenic practices following the rise of the Nazi movement in Germany under the rule of Hitler, a secret Jew who worked for the Jews’ plan for world domination.

The whole history surrounding the eugenics movement fits into the Jewish plan well – too well to assume that it happened by mere accident. The books and papers about the history of eugenics after Hitler’s regime are mainly written, published, and promoted by Jews. For just two examples, one may refer to the Jew Edwin Black’s famous book on eugenics, War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race, and the Jew Stefan Kühl’s book The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. The Jews Daniel Kevles, Mark Haller, and Kenneth Ludmerer are a few more prominent writers on the history of the eugenics movement and the supposed “misuse” of science by eugenicists.

The eugenics ideology was openly supported throughout the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. Both Supreme Court justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis – who was himself a Jew – ruled in favor of the pro-sterilization Buck v. Bell decision in 1927. In the 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind … Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” There were compulsory sterilization laws and marriage restrictions enacted in 27 states. Eugenics practitioners would sterilize approximately 60,000 Americans, and barred the marriage of some thousands.

California was the epicenter of the eugenics movement in the United States. Before World War II, nearly half of all coercive sterilizations in the country were done in California. Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California’s eugenic societies, such as Pasadena’s Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These organizations, which functioned as part of a “closely-knit” network, published eugenic newsletters and scientific journals.

Research was backed by the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations. The Cold Springs Harbor Institute was built to carry out this research, but important work was also done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, and Johns Hopkins. Legislation to address the crisis was passed in states from New York to California. These efforts had the support of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council.

All in all, the research, legislation and molding of public opinion surrounding eugenics went on for almost half a century in the United States. But those who are in favor of eugenic policies today are vituperated and called “Nazis” who are ignorant and “blind to reality”. Always we are given sentimental arguments for why eugenics is “wrong”. But the Jews never provide scientific evidence to negate the foundations of eugenics.

“The major factor in the decline of eugenics was undoubtedly Hitlerism.” 

– Paul Popenoe

Let’s examine one of the most influential of eugenicists, Paul Popenoe. (In this article I will bring attention mainly to the eugenics subverters who were not openly Jewish.) From my researches, it is reasonable to conclude that Popenoe was a willing supporter of the Jews, and possibly was himself a Jew. Popenoe was a sexual and relationship counselor, which is an obvious clue as to his ancestral descent. We know how preoccupied the Jews are with activities concerning lustful pursuits. He also was a college professor, and many college professors are Jews.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is paul-popenoe.jpgPaul Popenoe. He bears a resemblance to the actor Zac Efron, who is of partly Jewish descent – though, of course, Popenoe’s work doesn’t have nearly as large a following today as that of Efron’s performances.

In 1918, Popenoe co-wrote the widely used textbook, Applied Eugenics.

A favorable report by the Human Betterment Foundation, which Popenoe helped found, which praised the results of the sterilizations done in California, was often cited by the Nazi government as evidence that such wide-reaching eugenic efforts were humane and effective.

Here is what Popenoe has to state about Jews (taken from his book Modern Marriage (second ed., 1940); in the quote, Popenoe discusses a talk he had with a client who is married to a Jew):

“‘When I married Rebecca,’ George explained to me, ‘I was not at all worried by the fact that her parents were orthodox Jews. Rebecca and I were more or less freethinkers [we know what this means – “freethinker” can be seen as a euphemism for “atheist”, and most Jews are atheists], anyway; but I respect the Jewish religion as much as any other. Rebecca herself had not been in a synagogue for years. But I overlooked the fact, which I ought to have known, that the Jews represent not merely a religion but a culture [another euphemism which is obviously meant to hide the fact that the Jews form a genetic group]. Rebecca could give up the old religious formalities, but she could hardly shake off the entire influence of the culture in which she was reared.

“‘For instance, I had not counted on the strength of family ties among the Jews; although, if I had been asked about it, I should have told you how much I admired their feeling of family solidarity. My own family had moved west and separated from all its relatives. We never had family reunions in our home – there was no one to reunite. Rebecca’s family took me right in as one of themselves; no one could have treated me better than they did personally, in business, in every possible way. A good deal of my success in the automobile business has been due to the fact that her relatives, down to the second and third cousins, began to turn sales my way.

“‘Since I had no relatives near, it was natural that we should be invited for all holidays, for dinner every Sunday, and for all sorts of other affairs, to the home of Rebecca’s parents. They are wonderful people – superior in most respects to mine. But I soon began to feel that I was isolated; I felt like an outsider, no matter how grand they all were to me. They all had things to talk about, that they had been doing and talking about all their lives, and which were good things, but not my things. There was inevitably the same group: Uncle Moe and Uncle Isaac and Uncle Solomon, Aunt Sarah and Aunt Rachel, admirable people all of them; but not my people. They were always reminiscing, always alluding to little family jokes. I was a stranger, even though an honored stranger.

“‘I felt suffocated.

“‘When I suggested that we refuse to go to so many Sunday dinners, Rebecca was hurt. ‘Why not?’ she would ask. ‘What excuse have we for hurting their feelings like that? Surely it doesn’t harm us to eat a meal once or twice a week with my family. If your family were here. I’d go to their home any time they invited me, naturally.’

“‘What could I say? Intellectually, I knew that my feeling was wrong; but I’m terribly uncomfortable, nevertheless. The food is not my kind, the conversation is not my kind, the people are not my kind; probably they’re all better than my kind [something the Jews would love for us to believe]; I respect them greatly; but I’m always on the defensive.

“‘I always prided myself on being intellectually emancipated, and I had not fully realized my unconscious rebellion until our son was born. Rebecca wanted to have him circumcised for hygienic reasons [of course, circumcision is a crime by Jews against non-Jews, which the Jews promoted to help disguise their tribe among non-Jews] – the doctor advised it. It happens that I myself am not circumcised; although, in the swimming pool at the Y.M.C.A. and in the locker room of the Presbyterian college which I attended, I had occasion to note that a majority of the boys were circumcised. But this became a symbol to me: I could not help feeling, ‘They’re going to make a Jew out of him.’ I burst out into a violent opposition, far beyond the importance of the matter; and Rebecca, of course, let me have my own way. But my violence was a warning to me of my own emotional tensions. I adore my wife; and yet, Dr. Popenoe, I sometimes feel like a rat in a trap.’

“Such was the reaction of an intelligent young man, who found himself drawn into Jewish culture in a great city of Ohio. Rebecca might have felt similarly if she had been plunged into the evangelical atmosphere of a small town in Mississippi.

“There are similar differences between the democratic outlook of a Congregationalist or a Unitarian and the authoritarian tradition of a Roman Catholic. Such differences have nothing directly to do with theological beliefs, but they color much of one’s outlook throughout life [Popenoe mentions the religious differences, but purposely does not mention that Jews are related by race, not religion].

“Moreover, these differences of all sorts, implanted in earliest childhood, have their roots deep. They may be disregarded in young manhood, hut they crop out later. Husband and wife may be satisfied to have no church affiliations, but worried lest they are making a mistake by not having their own children go to Sunday school. Differences in attitude toward birth control [Jews dominate the birth control movement], toward abortion [the abortion clinics are all owned by Jews, the reasons for which are expounded near the end of this article], toward divorce, toward the status of women [Jews control the feminist movement], may be based not on rational analysis but on the emotionally colored convictions implanted in youth.

“After all this has been said – and every reader could document my remarks by cases from his own knowledge – the interesting fact remains that statistically, in a number of studies, there is little or no connection between differences of religious faith or affiliation, and happiness in marriage [again, Popenoe mentions Jews as a religious group while refusing to mention Jewry’s genetic ties]. The answer to this probably lies in the fact that these studies have been made in regions where religious differences have become less important because religious interests in general have waned. Beyond this, those that marry and remain married long enough to figure in surveys have probably worked out a successful adjustment; they started with attitudes favorable to success.”

Why would a eugenicist and the chief editor of the Journal of Heredity avoid the fact that Jews are genetically related, and instead refer to them as a religious group? Because Popenoe was a supporter of the Jews who promoted eugenics to discredit it through sentimental appeal to the masses by helping to introduce the eugenics concept to Germany under the Jew Hitler’s regime – thereby bringing the study of eugenics to its downfall.

Another Jewish subverter of the eugenics movement was Raymond Pearl (his surname was an anglicization of the more obviously Jewish “Perl”).

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is raymond-pearl.jpgRaymond Pearl, Jew

Pearl published a work about Jewish and Christian intermarriages. As would be expected for a Jew, Pearl, like Popenoe, avoided the genetic affiliations of Jewry in his publication, instead trying to distinguish them on the basis of religion. He also published a work called “The Relative Time of Fertilization of the Ovum and the Sex Ratio Amongst Jews”, which was co-written by a fellow Jew by the name of Redcliffe Salaman.

Pearl also published a book on alcohol consumption, titled Alcohol and Longevity (1926), in which he claimed that consumption of alcohol has a beneficial effect on cardiovascular health. Of course, since the Jewish race controls the industry of alcohol and other drugs, it would be only natural for a Jew like Pearl to promote such fallacious and perilous (the pun was not intended) lies and deception to the notice of the public.

Pearl was a Jew employed to help muddle eugenic principles and to establish it as pseudoscience. In 1925, Pearl denounced eugenics as ill-informed and prejudiced, and criticized the use of race in eugenics, despite conducting studies concerning racial differences. In 1927, he published the article “The Biology of Superiority”, which attacked the fundamentals of the eugenics movement. It was the first attack on eugenics by someone who was once thought to be a part of the movement. This work helped lead to reform eugenics and the population control movement. Pearl was an influential member of the Advisory Committee of the World Population Conference, and he helped found the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population Problems.

Despite his apparent rejection of eugenics, Pearl maintained relatively good relations with key eugenicists. Pearl was a supporter of the Jewish birth control movement. From 1927 to 1932, Pearl and his colleague, the Jew Alan Meyer, were important figures of one of the first birth control clinics in the United States, Baltimore’s Bureau for Contraceptive Advice. The clinic performed a eugenic medicine study that looked at how the distribution of birth control information that was provided by a clinic affected society. Of course, the birth control movement was started by Jews to separate sexual intercourse from the necessity of procreation, thereby starting the Jewish “Sexual Revolution”, while also bolstering the feminist movement, which was also a product of the Jewish mind.

Stanford President David Starr Jordan was another Jewish eugenicist. Besides the fact that Jews are rampant at colleges and universities, his name alone is enough for one to infer what his race was. Notwithstanding “David”, which is an obviously Jewish name, his surname, “Jordan”, is of Hebrew origin, meaning “one who descends”. Jordan praised the Jew Nordau’s work on degeneration in Popular Science Monthly, a journal to which the ichthyologist frequently contributed.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is david-starr-jordan.jpgHook-nosed invader of the eugenics movement “Starr of David” Jordan

The Jews needed the US to supply most of the work on eugenics rather than Nazi Germany. By associating the US with eugenics, the masses at the time would feel that the eugenics movement was not based on false principles, but on science and reason. If the Jews made Nazi Germany the first major eugenics proponent, the masses would forever associate Nazis with eugenics, thereby tainting it with sentimentalism. The Jews would only later support the Nazi eugenics program to bring aversion to the study of eugenics through its association with Nazism among the masses.

Today, anyone who supports eugenics is criticized as a Nazi and an end is immediately put to what he has to say on the matter. But to justify the use of eugenics among the scientific authorities of Nazi Germany, the Jews needed to base the eugenics movement on sound and scientific reasoning. Of course, the scientific principles of eugenics have not changed. Only its emotional support among the masses has – but that’s all the Jews needed to bring eugenics to its end.

There was funding for eugenic projects by corporate philanthropies, including the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune.

In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. From Cold Spring Harbor eugenicists agitated in the legislatures of America and the nation’s social services, agencies, and associations.

Eugenics research was funded by the Carnegie Foundation, and later it was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. The latter was so enthusiastic that even after the center of the eugenics effort moved to Germany, the Rockefeller Foundation continued to finance German researchers at a very high level. The foundation was quiet about it, but they were still funding research in 1939, only months before the onset of World War II.

The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 – about $4 million in today’s money – to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 toward creation of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Ruedin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler’s systematic medical repression.

Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute’s complex of eugenics institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. That changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the institute, once again, was psychiatrist Ernst Ruedin. (A highly informative and at least somewhat objective history and summary of the workings of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics is to be found in the work The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics, 1927-1945 by Hans-Walter Schmuhl (2008).)

Max Hirsch, a Jewish gynecologist, was one early proponents of the eugenics movement. Norman Haire (real name: Zions) was another prominent Jewish gynecologist and eugenicist who was also a sexologist who was a student of Havelock Ellis and praised philosopher, social commentator, and translator Anthony Ludovici and the veterinarian and eugenicist Leon F. Whitney, both of whom the Jews claim were sympathizers of the Nazis.

The Jews, following Hitlerism and Nazism, could rely on the originally eugenic aim of birth control into the non-eugenic channel of unrestrained licentiousness to cause further social and moral disorder. The Jews pretended to be supporters of the eugenic movement to promote their own radical ideas of licentiousness (through birth control promotion) and individualism and feminism.

The Jews, representing the leadership of early liberal eugenics, staged their abhorrence to eugenics following their own race’s Nazi movement and their criticism of the eugenics movement. The Jews are the foremost influencers of eugenics to this day (but of course, nothing is left untainted when it reaches the Jew), while discouraging its practice among non-Jews.

At the time of Rockefeller’s endowment, the eugenicist Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer functioned as head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer’s early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenics press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenics physician’s journal he edited, that Germany’s war would yield a “total solution to the Jewish problem.”

Verschuer had a longtime assistant. His name was Josef Mengele. Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenics studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the great institutions they helped found, and the science they helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own.

The Rockefeller Foundation funded Nazi eugenicists to increase negative sentiment among the masses for eugenics by connecting it with the Jew Hitler’s Nazi regime. The Jews did want want the Rockefellers to take culpability by funding the Nazi movement before the rise of the Nazis in 1933, thereby helping Nazi eugenicists fail the eugenics movement through the movement’s association with Nazism, while also diverting blame from the Jews at the Rockefeller Foundation by their pretended ignorance to the Nazis’ plans. In Mein Kampf (1925), the Jew Hitler cited eugenics laws enacted in the United States as a model for Germany. Nazi Germany would enact the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring as early as 1933 under Hitler’s rule, a law which openly drew inspiration from eugenicists in America. It was one of the first laws that Hitler passed when he was Fuehrer of Germany.

Meanwhile, the Rockefeller Foundation also provided heavy funding to Margaret Sanger’s birth control campaign in the United States in 1923. Sanger was married to a Jew and was an outspoken critic of the Nazi movement.

Why are the Jews willing to admit that the Nazis took eugenic ideas from America? The Jews knew that if eugenic ideas were popularized in Nazi Germany before they were popularized in America, then the eugenic movement would thereafter be associated with Nazism and “evil”. The Jews needed rational and democratic America to propagate the science of eugenics, and later tainted it by association. During the 1920s, the Carnegie Institution’s eugenic researchers cultivated relationships with eugenicists in Germany. Only after eugenics became a popular topic in the United States was the campaign popularized in Germany through the effort of the California eugenicists, who circulated publications advocating compulsory sterilization to the officials and researchers in Germany.

After permanently damaging the eugenics movement by promoting it in Nazi Germany, the Jews needed to justify that its principles were prejudiced and misinformed by discouraging the spread of eugenics in America and the rest of the world following the National Socialist regime. During the Reich’s early years, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler’s plans as the logical fulfillment of their own decades of research and effort. California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda for American consumption. They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits, such as an August 1934 display at the Los Angeles County Museum, for the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association. These associations with Nazism would forever damage the public’s view of eugenics.

If one looks closely, the Jews never are able to discredit eugenics as a false science, so instead they attempt to emotionally defame it by associating it with Hitler and his policies – especially the “oh-so-unfortunate persecution of the Jews” by the Nazis. After World War II, nobody was a eugenicist, and nobody had ever been a eugenicist. The Jews quietly removed eugenics texts from public view. Those who today believe in racial and hereditary differences are now inevitably considered supporters of Hitler. Despite controlling both sides of the war, the Jews needed the victory of the Allies as they needed a population of humans that would docilely follow its fatal principles of dysgenics, in contrast to the (flawed) ideas of race and eugenics proposed by the Jewish leader Hitler. The “exposure” of Nazi policies by the Allies “spelled the death” of racial solidarity and eugenics. Its epitaph was written by the post-war international “scientific” (Judeo-indoctrinating) community in four statements on race by the Jewish organization UNESCO.

During World War II, when Arthur Keith, the preeminent anthropologist of Britain, stated that Germany’s eugenic policy was in accord with the laws of evolutionary survival, the Jewish media quietly dismissed him. No longer was science able to take precedence in a topic that had become a political issue.

Eugenics ceased to be a subject for college classrooms, despite its ideas continuing to have an effect in euphemistic form. The Jews today are openly practicing eugenics by opening abortion clinics, in which pregnant women can choose to terminate a pregnancy if they discover that the fetus is afflicted with some hereditary disease. Why would the Jews let this happen if they are in favor of lowering our moral, intellectual, and physical capacities? My response is that this goal of Jewish domination is not so simple. Who are the ones behind the propagation of degeneracy? We must also bear in mind that the so-called abortions on hereditarily diseased fetuses are nearly always done because of grave physical deformities and genetic propensity to serious physical diseases. It’s not enough to screen a fetus for mongolism, or some other grave deformity. The more important mental and moral hereditary predispositions of the progeny are intentionally overlooked by the Jewish health organizations. The best of the non-Jewish peoples have been “kept in check by the Jews” by constantly discouraging their propagation, while inferior types are encouraged to reproduce – creating another generation of inferior beings intended to serve World Jewry.

Read any of the more recent articles or books on the history of eugenics, or even on the study of eugenics itself. All of them have been written, published, and promoted by Jews and rely on emotional appeal rather than scientific reasoning to dissuade the people from further study of eugenic ideas.

The world needs eugenics, and the Jews know it. With the rising tide of intellectual and moral (and perhaps even physical) defectives, action is absolutely necessary to prevent the pernicious influence which the propagation of and open support for such persons indelibly promotes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *